Assessment Tenets

 

Assessment practices must build hope, efficacy, and achievement for learners and teachers. In this learning environment, the following tenets ground all of our assessment policies and practices:

  1. Student investment occurs when assessment and self-regulation have a symbiotic relationship.
    • Student goal setting
    • Student tracking of learning
    • Self-assessment
    • Data notebooks
    • Creating hope
    • Growth mindset
    • Cocreating criteria
  2. The communication of assessment results must generate productive responses from learners and all the stakeholders who support them.
    • Feedback
    • Student tracking of learning
    • Grades/grading
    • Standards-based grading
    • Standards-based report cards
    • Increased motivation
    • Collaborative scoring
    • Students communicating their results to parents, guardians
    • Student-led conferencing
  3. Assessment architecture is most effective when it is planned, purposeful, and intentionally sequenced in advance of instruction by all of those responsible for the delivery.
    • Selected response, constructed response, and performance assessments
    • Rubrics and proficiency scales
    • Alignment of formative and summative assessments
    • Assessment validation
    • Systems alignment
    • Unpacking and prioritizing standards
    • Success criteria
    • Learning targets
    • Increasing rigor and proficiency levels
    • Universal design
  4. Assessment purposes (formative and summative) must be interdependent to maximize learning and verify achievement.
    • Validating aligned systems
    • Creating protocols and tools
    • Using large scale assessments, standardized assessments, district benchmarks, and classroom assessments
  5. Instructional agility occurs when emerging evidence informs real-time modifications within the context of the expected learning.
    • Using formative data
    • Creating interventions, enrichments, and re-engagement strategies
    • Gathering meaningful evidence at the classroom level
    • Utilizing formative strategies for daily instruction
    • Employing planned hinge, reflective questions, prompts, and cues
    • Analyzing data by skill and by learner
  6. The interpretation of assessment results must be accurate, accessible, and reliable.
    • Using formative data
    • Creating interventions, enrichments, and re-engagement strategies
    • Gathering meaningful evidence at the classroom level
    • Utilizing formative strategies for daily instruction
    • Employing planned hinge, reflective questions, prompts, cues
    • Analyzing data by skill and by learner

Foundation: A learning-rich culture provides opportunities for risk taking, productive failure, and celebrated successes.

C. Erkens, T. Schimmer, & N. Vagle, 2015